phd thesis microfinance

ScholarBank@NUS is available to both users seeking to deposit their works online and users who would like to access and reference the works of others. Users who deposit a work into ScholarBank@NUS must be the original author of that work and also ensure that the work does not infringe the rights, including copyright, of any third party. If third party material is incorporated into such work, the user must ensure that permission from the owner of such third party material has been obtained for its incorporation and for the submission and use of the same for purposes of ScholarBank@NUS. Users who deposit their work into ScholarBank@NUS retain the copyright to their work but are required to grant the University a royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual and non-exclusive licence to use and reproduce the work. The terms of the licence are available here. Unless otherwise specified, all works in ScholarBank@NUS can be accessed, printed and/or downloaded by users for their own academic research, private study and teaching purposes. Under no circumstances shall users access and use the works of others in ScholarBank@NUS for commercial purposes or for dissemination to another person or entity. All users of ScholarBank@NUS are required to observe the Terms of Use. The full text of the Terms of Use is available here. I have carefully read and fully understood the Terms of Use and agree to accept the same.
Sorry, Readability does not yet present PDFs in a reading view.[View Original.
Sorry, Readability does not yet present PDFs in a reading view.[View Original.
Ph.D. Thesis Author(s): Maria Albertina Kirsten Supervisor: Professor Servaas van der Berg; Professor Andrie Schoombee Institution: Stellenbosch University, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, Department of Economics Download: PDF (6.246Mb) Abstract: Poverty in South Africa’s rural areas is complex and severe, especially among female-headed households. The marginalisation of South Africa’s rural areas over a period of decades resulted in an acute lack of economic opportunities, limited infrastructure and a serious breakdown of social capital. Women living in rural areas are particularly poor in moneymetric terms; they are often illiterate and therefore isolated from economic and social opportunities; and many fall victim to violence in the household. They eke out a meagre existence, based on small-scale agriculture, marginal self-employment or limited wage and remittance income. While such income diversification, combined with the government’s range of development interventions, helps to buffer them against risks such as illness, death and disaster, rural poverty is not just a matter of income and assets. It is also rooted in other disadvantages, such as exclusion, disempowerment and unequal power relations. These all contribute to making poverty a multidimensional phenomenon. The South African government has committed significant resources to poverty intervention over the past 17 years. These interventions, which include social assistance grants, basic municipal services and free water, electricity, schooling and health services, certainly have an impact on the livelihoods of the rural poor, but they do not seem to bring a significant improvement in the standard of living of the most vulnerable people in marginalised areas. There is increasing recognition in the poverty literature that vulnerabilities – of income, health, social exclusion and service.