rogerian essay outline

Summary: This resource outlines the generally accepted structure for introductions, body paragraphs, and conclusions in an academic argument paper. Keep in mind that this resource contains guidelines and not strict rules about organization. Your structure needs to be flexible enough to meet the requirements of your purpose and audience. Contributors:Allen BrizeeLast Edited: 2013-02-25 10:10:40 The following sections outline the generally accepted structure for an academic argument paper. Keep in mind that these are guidelines and that your structure needs to be flexible enough to meet the requirements of your purpose and audience. You may also use the following Purdue OWL resources to help you with your argument paper: Introduction The introduction is the broad beginning of the paper that answers three important questions: What is this? Why am I reading it? What do you want me to do? You should answer these questions by doing the following: Set the context –provide general information about the main idea, explaining the situation so the reader can make sense of the topic and the claims you make and support State why the main idea is important –tell the reader why he or she should care and keep reading. Your goal is to create a compelling, clear, and convincing essay people will want to read and act upon State your thesis/claim –compose a sentence or two stating the position you will support with logos (sound reasoning: induction, deduction), pathos (balanced emotional appeal), and ethos (author credibility). For exploratory essays, your primary research question would replace your thesis statement so that the audience understands why you began your inquiry. An overview of the types of sources you explored might follow your research question. If your argument paper is long, you may want to forecast how you will support your thesis by outlining the structure of your.
A Rogerian essay, named for psychologist Carl Rogers, is among the hardest forms of essays to write. Rather than being aimed at a comprehensive win, it is designed at the creation of a basis for dialogue, convincing a reader with an opposing opinion of entering into a mutually respectful and positive exchange of ideas. Writing a Rogerian essay demands many of the same skills as any form of expository writing. However, where most essays dealing with conflicting topics are either intended as largely neutral descriptions of fact or are intended to win an argument, a Rogerian essay is intended to open the possibility of a positive dialogue between people with divergent opinions. Items you will need Research on both sides of a dispute Step 1 Research the topic of the essay, with care given to understanding not only your own preferred position but that of individuals who disagree strongly. The Rogerian form cannot proceed without this depth of research and empathic and just consideration. Where many essays can allow lopsided research, the Rogerian essay must be either balanced or, if anything, should favor research on the opposing position. Step 2 Outline the first stage of the essay, which is introductory. The writer presents the topic and concedes that the topic is one on which honest individuals disagree strongly. Step 3 Outline the second stage, which is a brief appeal to readers, indicating that progress may be made through understanding, the recognition of mutually shared positions and concerns, and through a just and respectful exchange of ideas. This stage stresses shared benefits and shared costs of the topic, and it prepares the reader to consider the arguments with a calm and open frame of mind. Step 4 Outline the third stage. In the third stage, state your own position very briefly -- enough to provide the reader with an understanding of your beliefs in.
Rogerian Argument Outline. In writing your outline for your Rogerian argument essay, you first have to familiarize yourself with the pros and cons or the two possible sides of your topic. That is, get to know which side of the argument you are for and which side of the argument may be against your position. For example, if you're trying to make an outline for your Rogerian argument essay with the topic of smoking in public places, the two most likely sides of the argument is: 1)Smoking in public places should be banned, and 2)smoking in public places should NOT be banned. The basic assumption is that your chosen topic can be argued, and it is your task, therefore, to defend your position on the topic. Here are the steps in writing your Rogerian argument outline.[Let's assume the topic is smoking in public places, and your position is that it should not be banned.][Introduction; generally state the common grounds ]-There are people who smoke in public places.[Body; make a slow transition from the common grounds to your position on the topic]-The law does not prohibit people from smoking.-People have the free will to do anything they want so long as what they do does not bring harm to others.-It is true that other people who do not smoke can still acquire lung problems from secondhand smoke.-Creating laws banning people from smoking is an act of defying the right to self-determination and freewill.-There is one viable way to address the dilemma: the creation of smoking areas in public places.-The solution gives smokers the chance to smoke in public places while giving non-smokers the reminder not to frequent smoking areas so as not to get health problems from secondhand smoke.[Conclusion; state your position]-Therefore, smoking in public places should not be banned.Of course, the example given simply gives a general overview of how your outline should be framed in.
In this video I create an example outline for the Rogerian Argument essay.
Search these databases for news, magazine, reference and journal articles for writing your papers: Academic OneFile A broad range of topics is covered in this general database, which includes full-text articles from thousands of periodicals as well as some reference books. CQ Researcher Online Original, comprehensive reporting and analysis on issues in the news, including science issues. Credo Reference Reference E-Books Ferguson's Career Guidance Center Covers over 3800 careers in job profiles found in articles from books. General OneFile News, magazine, and journal articles across a wide range of topics. Grand Rapids Press Grand Rapids articles from 2000-current. InfoTrac Newsstand A worldwide full-text database that includes more than 350 titles. JSTOR JSTOR provides access to the highest-quality academic journals, books, and primary sources in the humanities, social sciences, and sciences. Newsbank: Michigan Newspapers Full-text of Michigan newspapers including the Detroit News: 1999 to current, Grand Rapids Press: 2000 to current, and more. New York Times Full-text of the New York Times 1980-present. Opposing Viewpoints in Context Full-text articles and essays covering social issues. Points of View Reference Center Provides pro's and con's of different debatable topics; it also has a list of interesting topics if you need paper topic ideas. Proquest Research Library Includes a mix of scholarly journals, trade publications, magazines, and newspapers on many topics. SocINDEX with Full Text Comprehensive sociology research database covering the broad spectrum of sociological study.
The Rogerian argument, inspired by the influential psychologist Carl Rogers aims to find compromise on a controversial issue. If you are using the Rogerian approach your introduction to the argument should accomplish three objectives: Introduce the author and work Usually, you will introduce the author and work in the first sentence: Here is an example: In Dwight Okita's In Response to Executive Order 9066, the narrator addresses an inevitable by-product of war – racism. The first time you refer to the author, refer to him or her by his or her full name. After that, refer to the author by last name only. Never refer to an author by his or her first name only. Provide the audience a short but concise summary of the work to which you are responding Remember, your audience has already read the work you are responding to. Therefore, you do not need to provide a lengthy summary. Focus on the main points of the work to which you are responding and use direct quotations sparingly. Direct quotations work best when they are powerful and compelling. State the main issue addressed in the work Your thesis, or claim, will come after you summarize the two sides of the issue. Back to top The Introduction The following is an example of how the introduction of a Rogerian argument can be written. The topic is racial profiling. In Dwight Okita's In Response to Executive Order 9066, the narrator -- a young Japanese-American -- writes a letter to the government, who has ordered her family into a relocation camp after Pearl Harbor. In the letter, the narrator details the people in her life, from her father to her best friend at school. Since the narrator is of Japanese descent, her best friend accuses her of trying to start a war (18). The narrator is seemingly too naïve to realize the ignorance of this statement, and tells the government that she asked this friend to plant tomato seeds.