reading vs watching tv essays

When you ask people whether they prefer 'Movies or Books', you are likely to get a variety of replies. Some people will prefer reading books and other will prefer watching movies. There is another interesting phenomena and that is a section of the population that enjoy both equally. Main For some people, reading a book is not the easiest activity in the world. We have all sometimes picked up a book and put it down after battling to read the first page. This is nothing to do with ability or concentration, it is to do with whether or not the book is of personal interest or whether the book actually meets our needs. In other words what is inside the covers of the book may not match the blurb on the outside which is very misleading and very disappointing. The same can be said for movies. How often have we all watched the trailers advertised on TV, thinking that the movie looks really interesting? Then follows the anticipation of going to the movies to watch it, or wait until its available to download and rent at home, only to watch the first ten minutes and realise that it is not going to get any better than 'boring'! Sometimes it is easier to watch a movie rather than read the book. Some movies that are adaptations of books can enhance the setting, the scenery and dialogue. This is especially helpful for people who have experienced difficulty in learning to read, as watching the movie as well as reading the book can enhance the experience. A movie adaptation can enhance the experience of the book and can bring to life, and get transported into 'this other world'. Visual images are very powerful, but so is the experience of reading and development of our own images. It can also be argued that in order to use our imagination whilst reading we need to have some actual experience of the situation and that experience either comes through accurate and informative writing or.
Hi, I am zeable. I am preparing for Ielts test. This is my essay for a writing task 2. Please correct me. Thank you so much!Some people spend more time reading books, while others prefer to watch TV. The former group is more likely to develop creative imaginations and have a much better grasp of language skills. To what extend do you agree or disagree?Nowadays, there are plenty of measures to obtain information and gain knowledge, among which reading and watching television are the most common ways. Some people believe those who prefer reading stand a better chance to have innovative thinking and greater development on language. However I personally object to this opinion and hold that there is no reason in saying watching TV is inferior to reading books.Equal credits should be given to reading and watching TV in developing creative minds. As a matter of fact, imagining is closely entwisted to reading. When people read novels and magazines, what is happening in their minds is the restructure and reorganization of the information and knowledge in books. It is a most common way in which our imaginations function creatively and are improved. Nevertheless, the advantages of developing innovative thinking through watching TV should not be neglected. Some people criticize there is no necessity for our brains to work as all information on TV are shown in detailed and vivid images. Regarding this, my question is how a person can have the best understanding of a car if he doesn't see a car before. Admittedly or not, it is the fully depicted words, figures and stories that serve as source when our creative minds work.In terms of improving language ability, reading and watching television both benefit human. The advantages of reading in developing communication skills are quite obvious. One of those is that the more books an individual read, the better literacy he or she has.
Do you know we are ruled by television? People watch television too much today. The average child watches an average of twenty-eight hours of television a week. Most people think they would have a hard time living without a television. The obsession with television has major effects on society that are quite unpleasant. In other words, it is widely held that television rots the brain, encourages sloth, desensitizes us to violence, stifles creative thought, shortens the attention span, erodes the capacity for critical thinking, shortens the attention span and affects the memory. Television gives us a warped view of the world. If we were to accept the template of society provided by television we’d probably think that consumption is the source of happiness, thanks to advertising; that most of life’s problems have a neat solution that can be reached in 48 minutes, care of one-hour TV drama; and that crime is common and injustice is entertaining. Life on television is almost always simple: good guys and bad, nice girls and whores, smart guys and dumb. And if life in the real world isn’t that simple, well, hey, man, have some dope, man, be happy, feel good. (Hamill, 543) Furthermore, television, like drugs, dominates the lives of its addicts (Hamill, 542). For young children, television is an antisocial experience. A little child sits passively in front of the screen, insensible to what is going on around him. Conversation during the program is seldom if ever encouraged by the child or by the parents. Moreover, viewers can’t work or play while watching television; they can’t read; they can’t be out on the streets, falling in love with the wrong people, learning how to make friends and compromise with other human beings (Hamill, 542). Marie Winn, in the Plug-In Drug, wrote “ The primary danger of the television screen lies not so much in the behavior it produces – although.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People can learn more from watching television than reading books. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.(07.02.03) I post my essay here, and I need your suggestion on it, telling me which part is wordy or irrelevant to the topic. This paper seems a little bit long so if you can make it shorter within around 450 words, I would be grateful for your help.When speaking of television, we often come out with such an image in our mind: an angry mother chiding her kid spending too much time on TV programs instead of reading books. Truly, our parents always think of television is something that makes children addicted and thereby goes far from learning. However, when I recall my own experience of growth, I cannot find any blame of myself on TV. Quite the contrary, I consider television has better educational influence than books do for the following reasons.To start with, television has as much as coverage of knowledge as books. Television nowadays has been divided into specific sub channels. We have sport channel which exclusively focuses on physical activities and reports sport events; we can keep tracks of the latest news around the world on 24-hour news channel. We can freely fix on a certain television which meets our appetite most. Days are gone when television shows were simply designed to amuse the public, today's programs are more into the scientific areas that satisfy people's curiosity. Programs for kids have added more introductions of life skills to the naive ones; discovery channel bring us to explore the unknown world. Also, you can enjoy the lectures on live which discuss humanities like archeology, art and alike. As with books, these programs have successfully imparted knowledge of all kinds to audience. Moreover, since television has wider coverage of influenced population, it.