romeo and juliet book and movie comparison essay

In the 1996 film adaptation of the Shakespeare classic Romeo and Juliet, the director has exchanged the original setting of Verona, Italy, for a modern Verona Beach, California backdrop. The part of narrator throughout the tale is portrayed on a television screen, giving the viewer the idea that the tragic love story is unfolding on the local news. Contemporary references are used throughout the film to replace the somewhat archaic details of Shakespeare ˜s time. The film's creators chose to stick as close to the storyline as they could while still maintaining the present day urban setting. In the opening scene, the Capulets and the Montagues face off at a gas station rather than the Italian market. The feuding families' wield 9mm handguns named swords.  After the gas station brawl has come to an end, the prince, manifested here as the chief of police, dispatches his men to detain the two families responsible for this show of violence. These men show up in helicopters and police cars rather than on horseback. Romeo is talked into attending a costume party at the Capulets' mansion after hearing about the gathering on the television. Shakespeare chose to inform the young poetic lover by an illiterate messenger. In true modern day California style, Romeo takes some unidentified drug from Mercutio. The drug comes in the form of a tablet with a red heart, a reference to the feeling of heartbreak Romeo had been bathed in after losing his former love. The Capulets' luxurious mansion is equipped with a rather large aquarium, through which Romeo and Juliet first lay eyes on one another. In the original work, Romeo spotted Juliet across the room and asked a serving man about her. Sir Paris, the man to whom Juliet's father wished to give her away to, was dressed as an astronaut rather than a knight. After leaving the party in a sports car, Romeo leaps out of the backseat and.
Terms of Service updated 12 August 2009 Welcome to 123HelpMe.com (the Web Site ), which is produced by the Company. This page states the Terms of Service (the Terms or the TOS ) under which this Web Site is available for use. Please read this page carefully. By accessing and using this Web Site you accept and agree to be bound, without limitation or qualification, by these Terms and any other terms and conditions that may apply. The Company may, at its sole discretion, modify or revise these Terms at any time by updating this posting. You are bound by any such modification or revision and should therefore visit this page periodically to review the Terms. By using the Web Site after we have made any modification or revision, you agree to be bound by the revised terms. If you do not accept any of the Terms stated here, do not use the Web Site. The Company retains the right to deny access to anyone at its complete discretion for any reason, including but not limited to violation of these Terms. The Terms constitute the entire legal agreement between you and the Company. 1. Web Site Usage In consideration of your use of the Web Site, you represent that you are 1) of legal age to form a binding contract and 2) are not a person prohibited from receiving services under the laws of the United States or other jurisdiction. You further agree to use the Web Site only for purposes that are permitted by 1) the Terms and 2) any applicable law, regulation or generally accepted practice or guideline in the relevant jurisdictions, which includes any laws regarding the export of data to and from the United States or other relevant countries. As part of your use of the Web Site, you may be required to provide information about yourself, such as identification or contact details, as part of your continued use of the Services. You agree that any registration information you give to the.
Baz Luhrmann’s kaleidoscopic film adaptation of Romeo and Juliet, while often leaving much to be desired from the two main actors in the way of delivery, presents a fascinating modern interpretation of the 16th century drama. David Ansen, film critic, describes it as “alternately enrapturing and exhausting, brilliant and glib a Romeo and Juliet more for the eyes than the ears” (Newsweek). Sir Philip Sidney states in his Apology for Poetry that poetry should both delight and teach, and both the text and the film serve this purpose well—each suited to the time in which they were presented. Shakespeare incorporated jokes of the time, mentions of royalty, and allusions to historical events in his plays.  Luhrmann does this as well, pulling in numerous references to recent pop culture.  Both Shakespeare and Luhrmann endeavored to delight their audiences with beautiful costumes and familiar music, and to teach them with the basic moral precepts inherent in the story. A mere glance at the film will show anyone with even the slightest knowledge of the play that the two are ferociously different in terms of setting, costume, casting, music, and props.  A closer reading, however, will also illuminate significant deviations in verse. The differences between these two works are distinctly illustrated in Act One, Scene One of the text and its matching film scene.  Here Shakespeare's text shows Samson and Gregory of the house of Capulet exchanging in witty banter: SAMSON: I strike quickly, being moved.GREGORY: But thou art not quickly moved to strike.SAMSON: A dog of the house of Montague moves me (1.1 5-7). They continue their repartee until Abraham and another servingman of the Montagues arrive.  Gregory advises, “Draw thy tool.  Here comes of the house of Montagues” (1.1 29).  Samson responds, “Quarrel, I will back thee” (1.1 30).  Gregory suggests that frowning in their.
This student essay consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis of A Comparison and Contrast of Romeo & Juliet: Text Vs. Movie. This section contains 616 words (approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page) A Comparison and Contrast of Romeo & Juliet: Text Vs. Movie Summary: This essay compares and contrasts William Shakespeare's Play Romeo and Juliet with the modern movie Romeo and Juliet. Shakespear's most popular play, Romeo and Juliet, was modernized and put on tape. Although the lines were the same, many parts of the play were cut out or drastically changed. The three points that will be focused on are the characters, the setting and the final scene. First of all, the setting of the movie was much different than that of the play. The director decided to modernize the entire story. By doing this it changed many things like the weapons they used, their method of transportation, their homes etc. Instead of using swords, they had pistols. Instead of walking, they had cars to go around. And instead of their homes being against each other, it was two large businesses fighting. The movie also took place in a large city whereas the play took place in a small town. All of these differences are expected when the movie. (read more) This section contains 616 words (approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page) Copyrights A Comparison and Contrast of Romeo & Juliet: Text Vs. Movie from BookRags. (c)2016 BookRags, Inc. All rights reserved.
Enter Your Search Terms to Get Started! Romeo & Juliet Movies Comparison William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet is a cherished piece of literature that has been remade into movies many times throughout history. The 1968 version and the controversial 1996 version give different perspectives of Shakespeare's famous play. While the 1968 classical version of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet should be appreciated, the modern version portrays the complexity of love in a fast-paced society by using narrative and stylistic elements combined with energetic editing in an advanced, creative way. Primarily, casting decisions had a huge impact on character portrayal and the success of the movie. Romeo was played by a pretty boy in both movies to depict sensitivity and youthful attractiveness. Both Leonardo DiCaprio and Leonard Whiting depicted emotions well, but DiCaprio seemed less refined or proper in his movements to put a modern spin on the character. Also, Leonardo DiCaprio's fame aided in the movie's success while Whiting was unheard of in the world of acting. The role of Juliet as played by Olivia Hussey was delicate and graceful. She appeared flawlessly beautiful and fit the classical role perfectly, although her frantic crying fits were played somewhat out of proportion. Claire Danes played the part very well, and was more appropriate for the modern version, her fame aiding in the film's appeal as well. Mercutio was an interesting character in both films, but Harold Perrineau Jr. brought the character's dialogue and actions into today's world. Crazy and loud are some essential ingredients included when most people think about comedy today, and Perrineau depicted these traits to the extreme. His skin color caused the issue of race to be brought up in the movie. It enlightened people into a more modern and open state of mind because black actors were not included in the cast.