thesis statement anti death penalty

Thesis statement: Capital punishment proves ineffective as an instrument of deterring violent crime on political, ethical and theological grounds. The American public has long been supportive of capital punishment for convicted murderers, and that support continues to grow even today. In a Gallup Poll conducted in 1981, two in three Americans expressed overall approval for the death penalty. That support rose to three in four people in 1991, and to four out of five in 1994. Although these polls need to be interpreted with careful attention, it is obvious that there are few issues on which more Americans agree: “in at least some circumstances, death is seen as a justifiable punishment.” (Murray, 751) Having backed the claim for the ineffectiveness of capital punishments in preventing crime using statistics, an important disclaimer need to be added – “Statistics is not everything”. In other words, even if capital punishment is helpful as a deterrent of violent crime, it cannot justify the execution of a few innocent victims alongside the guilty ones. Hence, the claim that the death penalty was “morally obligatory” based on statistical findings alone is simply insufficient in dealing with the complexities of human nature. For example, Clive Stafford Smith, a renowned expert on ethical aspects of law makes some valid observations in his research article for the New Scientist: “I have spent more than 20 years representing some 300 men, women and children who faced capital punishment in various US states. I do not think of my clients as statistics. Six of them have died in the execution chamber. Often I have staved off executions only at the last minute. Many of my clients have been innocent: human beings make fallible judges, and no machine has more human parts than the criminal justice system. I therefore feel strongly that when academics step out of the classroom and.
Hi,Death penalty appearsis executed in many countries, either developed and developing nations from advanced nations to developing ones. Some people believe that this policy has positive impacts on social security while others claim that the violation of the human right is a downside of applying capital punishment. I totallyvigorously agree with the latter viewpoint because of its positive influences on human right and mental health of people for following reasons:(never use for following reasons. In the introduction you should briefly mention why you agree or disagree with the topic) Firstly, it is believed that this policytype of penalty (it would be better to say death penalty ) is conducive to social security (U can say: it is believed that death penalty can create a safe atmosphere in a society). The fact is that those people who take lives of others deserve the highest punishment and victim's families feel fairness (it would be better to use justice in this context). Nevertheless, it is undeniable that no sooner have judge carried out this penalty, they realize that the executed turn out be innocent (support what you claim by examples). Another point is that by dint of this punishment is the human right is violatedjeopardized. The truth is that everybody, despite making serious mistakes, should be given the chance to live and correct their mistakes as there goes a saying to err is human.Secondly, it is commonly seen that level of people's awareness (about what?) and warnings (what types of warnings and about what?, In fact you should state the main idea of the thesis statement.) increase is other benefit of death penalty (in the introduction you stated that you disagree with death penalty, but here you are talking about its advantages??????????). The natural rule is believed that by no means do government applies this policy (correct the sentence. it is.
What a great subject matter. The thesis you create must be in response to your real feelings, opinions, convictions and feelings about the topic. This helps make your thesis statement connect to your arguements and or debate.  You have to tie this in as a world issue. We must consider that the French Revolution was a powerfully influential revolution of modern time. In this Revolution the death of over 2000 people for a social cause had a real consequential connection to actus reas and mens reas. The death penalty is one of the oldest consequences for an act or acts of murder around the world. Even if the death penalty as a punishment is not legal, there is still death of human life at work in society. I am a supporter of the death penalty, but how could we ever assess or measure its success if deterrent is the aim: the guilty party is dead.  Potential Hypothetical Thesis: The death penalty does not penalize a convicted person of 1st degree murder, rather it echoes ancient Roman spectacles staged at the Colosseum.