essay on cigarette smoking in public places should be banned

Extracts from this document. Smoking should be banned in all public places Every year thousands of people die because of having cancer or other tobacco related illnesses due to smoking. Smoking is seen everywhere from our own television screens to even the world wide web; the internet. Tobacco is the substance that is in these cigarettes. These tobacco products are promoted through tobacco ads that are found almost everywhere you turn. They are in magazines, television screens, on the internet and even on cigarette boxes themselves. Alas, their tobacco ads do not tell the whole truth. Thus, many people fall prey to these tobacco cigarettes and once they try one cigarette, they are hooked on it. The reason this is so is the nicotine present in it, which is a kind of drug. So now, as you can see many have been addicted to the habit of smoking. Nowadays in almost all parts of the world has much controversy because people some people agree about smoke in public areas, but others who do not smoke complain about that; so much so that it has now become an issue.read more. This shows that smokers do not even know or bother about the consequences that their smoking brings. I think the only way that they would become conscious of this is if smoking is banned in all public areas. Another thing is that if smoking was to be banned in all public places, it would force these smokers to smoke lesser and to eventually quit smoking. Smokers would then grasp that they can only smoke in a particular area that is private and personal; like their own rooms. However, since many people spend most of their time at public places they would not be able to smoke a lot causing them to reduce the amount of cigarettes they smoke in a day. This may cause some side effects due to their addiction of nicotine. Nevertheless, they still can deal with it by chewing sweets and doing other things to keep.
This is a ban smoking in public places essay. It is an example of an essay where you have to give your opinion as to whether you agree or disagree. The sample answer shows you how you can present the opposing argument first, that is not your opinion, and then present your opinion in the following paragraph. It is always a good idea to present a balanced essay which presents both sides of the argument, but you must always make it very clear what your opinion is and which side of the argument you support. You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. You should write at least 250 words. Model Answer Medical studies have shown that smoking not only leads to health problems for the smoker, but also for people close by. As a result of this, many believe that smoking should not be allowed in public places. Although there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a ban is the most appropriate course of action. Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons. Firstly, they say that passive smokers make the choice to breathe in other people’s smoke by going to places where it is allowed. If they would prefer not to smoke passively, then they do not need to visit places where smoking is permitted. In addition, they believe a ban would possibly drive many bars and pubs out of business as smokers would not go there anymore. They also argue it is a matter of freedom of choice. Smoking is not against the law, so individuals should have the freedom to smoke where they wish. However, there are more convincing arguments in favour of a ban. First and foremost, it has.
Smoking in public places should be banned. Discuss. Today many smokers reckon a ban on smoking in public places as seizure of their personal freedom, however, this change; though irritate to those chain smokers but can minimise the increasing influence of smoking publicly. First, passive smokers are more susceptible to detrimental effects of smoking on their health. Thus, on account of a few smokers those who do not smoke have to suffer some serious health problems, which I, being a strong exponent of healthy life style, strongly oppose.  Another reason for justification of a ban on smoking is that very often children learn smoking by watching adults smoking in public places. If people smoke in their own rooms, they will not likely to inspire others to smoke. In a nutshell, smoking in public places is culpable for spreading of addiction, so it ought to be banned. Furthermore, occasional accidents caused by a smoldering butt of cigarette dumped carelessly provide strong corroboration for prohibition on smoking in public places. Many times such accidents claim thousands of lives and wreak havoc on buildings.  Last but not least, polluted poisonous emitted fumes by smoking in public places certainly aggravate the youth and motivate them to commit which results in their bad health with downing their resistance power.  Thus, a ban on smoking in public places should be welcomed immediately. This will curb many abovementioned nuisances certainly. Nevertheless, Government should provide special smoking zone at regular distances in public places which will not only console to some smokers but also lessen the exposure of smoking in public. .