essay planet of the apes

Prompt: Stanford students possess an intellectual vitality. Reflect on an idea or experience that has been important to your intellectual development.I can honestly say that my most recent intellectually stimulating experience was a trip to the movie theater; I saw Rise of the Planet of the Apes. Of course the CGI was visually stimulating, and talking monkeys are always intriguing, but what really hit me was the rapid advancement of the apes. Their progress was astonishing, beyond any potential human development. Coupled with their natural physical advantages, the apes’ elevated intellect made them unbeatable.Walking out of the theater, a theory initiated itself in my head: humans also once stole the torch of supremacy from a formerly great species. (Sound familiar, Prometheus?) Obviously, our superior intellect and opposable thumbs allowed us to surpass our ecological rivals and deliver us to primacy. Just as obviously, about 150 years ago Charlie Darwin expressed this theory of evolution  but let me take you on a hypothetical journey in order to complete my theory.Hypothetically, a species lived on a dull, flat Earth before the homo sapien sapiens. From this bland, spherical planet they raised mountains, gorged out bodies of water, and, in their ultimate masterpiece, constructed other, more complex beings. Eventually, these innovative creatures were overrun by humans, who took their turn in manifesting progress by advancing the world’s technology by “aping” what their predecessors left behind; the nervous system inspired computers, with the capacity to store knowledge and calculate equations; the circulatory system prompted irrigation, the dispersion of a vital liquid to many cells. Visible parallels between our make-up and our made-up are virtually everywhere.Is an iPhone as complex as a living cell? Absolutely not. Do we have the resources and the intellect to.
In the new cynical, cash-grabbing sweepstakes to manufacture polished, all-appealing four quadrant blockbusters— specifically engineered to reap hundreds of millions of dollars, of course— 20th Century Fox’s “Dawn Of The Planet Of The Apes” sequel is of a rare, rare breed. It’s the genuine article, an engrossing tentpole with serious themes, complex moral conflicts and emotional stakes, and one that doesn’t feel as if it was written by committee or structured around big and familiar action set pieces. And it’s one that executes on all its lofty ambitions from minute one with nary a false note. In truth, the deeply absorbing and thematically rich ‘Apes’ sequel is more akin to a drama than an action film, but it's one that still satisfies the desires and demands of big, blockbuster filmmaking. Brilliantly realized by director Matt Reeves (“Cloverfield,” “Let Me In”), “Dawn Of The Planet Of The Apes” is also the rare sequel that justifies its existence from the outset with an almost radically different approach that borders on soft reboot (in the best sense of beginning anew). While it doesn’t fully eschew its predecessor, “Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes,” it certainly doesn’t lean on the original and isn’t experienced as the latest episode in the further adventures of apes versus men (it functions so much as a standalone movie one could mistake it for disavowing 'Rise'). To that end, the only (major) returning character is Caesar, the young, genetically-evolved ape, motion-captured and vividly rendered to life by Andy Serkis. But the similarities in tone and thematic concerns are much darker and tragic. Whereas most sequels pick up where the last film left off, stars and heroes intact, ‘Dawn’ is more interested in legacy and consequences and how they reverberate, but only as a launching pad to explore a deeper story about leaders, the integrity of their characters, how.
The Planet of the Apes: A Resource for Teaching Archaeology in Introductory Classes on the Old Testament/Hebrew Bible [1]Steve Cook People who have seen the 1968 film The Planet of the Apes remember it for several reasons—the quote: “Get your stinking paws off me, you damned dirty ape,” the final shot of the partially buried Statue of Liberty, and actors in Academy Award-nominated costumes as chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans. [2] Some might recall that the film includes a scene that turns the Scopes Monkey Trial on its head (chapter sixteen) and that the actor who plays its “protagonist,” Colonel George Taylor, appeared as Moses in Cecil B. DeMille’s 1956 version of The Ten Commandments. It also bears noting that archaeology plays a crucial role in the story. Furthermore, in its representation and use of archaeology, Planet of the Apes provides a surprisingly helpful resource for introductory courses on the Old Testament/Hebrew Bible. In this brief essay, I want to highlight two ways in which Planet of the Apes can be especially useful: 1) productively exploring how archaeology interacts with students’ views on the Bible as scripture, and 2) effectively teaching the “archaeology basics” most often presented in introductory Old Testament/Hebrew Bible textbooks. Is the Bible True? For many (but not all) students in American classrooms, discussion of the Bible in light of archaeology potentially challenges their religious faith. This, of course, depends on whether or not the students have a faith-based commitment to the biblical text and/or how they understand this commitment. Nevertheless, for many students the archaeological results commonly presented in introductory texts (especially on the topics of Abraham, the Exodus, and Joshua’s conquest) can raise tough questions. And Planet of the Apes can provide a resource to discuss the impact of archaeology on the.
Planet of the Apes continues the tradition of such works as Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels (1726) and George Orwell’s Animal Farm (1946) in its use of the conceits of a society as a foil against which to reveal the foolishness of contemporary practices and mores. Indeed, Pierre Boulle is at his best in describing the psychological testing and its possible misinterpretations. While all three tales are closer to allegories than fantasies, the science-fiction conceits that Boulle employs limit his tale. That Professor Antelle finances the expedition privately is also an acknowledgment of the novel’s literary antecedents, especially those of Jules Verne. Verne’s tales tend to be more about adventure, however, and are usually without Boulle’s poignant examinations of social conventions and conceits. The underpinning premise of Boulle’s novel—that of humans causing their own apocalypse—is less blatant here than in other popular works that dealt with the possibility of self-species destruction, such as Nevil Shute’s On the Beach (1957). As a cautionary tale, Boulle’s work is necessarily muted—and, like a trumpet, enhanced by its subtlety. Ultimately, Boulle’s tale of “man’s inhumanity to man” strikes a chord with readers because of its belief that, even in the face of overwhelming prejudice, the values and virtues that make people “human” will prevail. Humanity, like earth, will abide.
While the free essays can give you inspiration for writing, they cannot be used 'as is' because they will not meet your assignment's requirements. If you are in a time crunch, then you need a custom written term paper on your subject (planet of the apes satire) Here you can hire an independent writer/researcher to custom write you an authentic essay to your specifications that will pass any plagiarism test (e.g. Turnitin). Waste no more time! Planet Of The ApesRole Reversal In The Planet of the Apes Shows Our True Side The Planet of the Apes is a satirical look at human society. This series, through role reversal.The setting of the movie compared to the setting in the book makes Planet of the Apes one of the greatest satires. In the movie, the setting takes place on earth in the future where apes deny and are afraid of the past, whereas the setting in the book is on a different planet where apes are civilized and technologically advanced, and the humans were primitive creatures. The orangutans in the movie prevent what happened to the humans from happening Science Fiction FilmsIt seems strange to realize that in the 1990s -- with Jurassic Park, the Star Wars trilogy, Terminator 2, and E.T. :The Extra-Terrestrial topping any list of the most popular.to the apes. Orangutans, such as Zaius went to great work as destroying the cave where the evidence of the humans reigned is revealed and removing Landen s memory. In the book civilization of humans on Earth is equal to and may even surpass the civilization of the apes on Sorror. The point of view in the book is through Ulysees mind. He is clam and patient. Taylor in the movie is an impatient angry man who is never 20th Century FoxWilhelm Fried was born in Hungary of German-Jewish parents, and brought to America while still an infant in 1879. As William Fox, he would preside over a major Hollywood film.satisfied and is.