should whaling be banned essay

A coalition of animal welfare organisations has said that methods of killing whales are so inhumane that all whaling operations should end. In a report called Troubled Waters, the group, Whalewatch, claims many whales do not die quickly when hit. And tests to decide exactly when a whale is dead are described as inadequate. However, whalers deny that their methods are cruel and reject calls to end the practice. What do you think? Should there be a complete worldwide ban on whaling? This debate is now closed. Read your comments below. The following comments reflect the balance of opinion we have received so far: We need more serious joined up ecological conservation I can see why some people want to ban whaling. But,on the other hand, why only whaling? Why not ban eating cows or chickens or whatever? Personally, I quite enjoy eating whales, as other people enjoy eating meat. If we cultivated whales, would you accept whaling? Kotomi. K, Japan Could someone explain why we need to kill whales at all? Surely we are advanced enough as a race not to keep killing our planet's natural life. Greed is the only reason for such action. We all need to see the damage we are causing ourselves and our planet.Trasie Howard, London, England In the last 300 years we have shot, fished and hunted everything with hooves, fins, and claws to the point edge of extinction. my concern is not what we should do BUT rather what we still can do. The problem here is the same as with the UN a basic lack of political will. If we continue to empty the seas for our own greed then we will be saving the whales so they may safely starve to death. After 300 years of ecological 'terrorism' we need more serious joined up ecological conservation. Allan McEwan, Canada/UK Yes, it should be banned. How could someone do this to something that existed long before humans! They never hurt anybody! Think, what would.
Search Results Free Essays Unrated Essays Better Essays Stronger Essays Powerful Essays Term Papers Research Papers Search by keyword:   Sort By:   Your search returned 160 essays for whaling : 1  2    Next >> These results are sorted by most relevant first (ranked search). You may also sort these by color rating or essay length. Title Length Color Rating   Is Whaling Humane? - Introduction Whaling has become a global environmental issue as vast numbers of whales are killed commercially and scientifically every year. Intense debate on the necessity of whaling has been stirred but failed to be resolved due to the lacking of pragmatic measures employed by the responsible parties. Whaling nations continue to defend their whaling right for cultural and research purposes. Yet, ethical and humanity issues are among the controversial disputes raised by concerned public. In February 2010, International Whaling Commission (IWC) proposed a plan of lifting whaling ban by limiting scientific whaling activities with the intention of reducing overall number of whales killed be.   [tags: The Whaling Controversy] :: 5 Works Cited 2246 words(6.4 pages) Better Essays [preview] The International Whaling Commission - Captain Paul Watson once stated in his guide to environmental conservation, Environmental activists may be a nuisance and a pain in the ass to the established authorities of the present. However, to the establishment of the future, we will be honored ancestors. (Watson, Earthforce) Today that very same man is on the run, hiding out in international waters, from the very same authorities he mentions. Captain Watson’s words could not be truer when it comes to the issues surrounding international commercial whaling.   [tags: commercial whaling, conservation, whaling industry] :: 5 Works Cited 1057 words(3 pages) Strong Essays [preview] Stop Whaling Now - Norway currently.
It appears that more people are against whaling than support it. The arguments for and against whaling have been hashed out in the news recently when anti-whaling advocates assaulted a Japanese whaling ship who then responded with water canons to an effort to thwart the attack. The debate continues to escalate with other recent events such as the high seas collision of the Shonan Maru 2, a Japanese whaling vessel, with the Ady Gil, an anti-whaling boat owned by the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. The primary argument for whaling comes from Japan, as they have the largest whaling operation in the whole world. Other countries such as Norway, Iceland, the Danish Faeroe Islands, and St. Lucia and St. Vincent & the Grenadines also support whaling. While Japan currently catches whales under the guise of scientific research, they desire to return to commercial whaling operations with seemingly few or minor limits on the quantities and types of whales to be caught. One main argument for whaling is that it is a historical right. The idea that people have been doing it for years seems like an effective one for those who want to continue hunting whales. There are some cultures who believe it is a cultural right to kill whales. This argument for whaling is granted as acceptable when speaking about small native tribes who might take one to two whales a year. It is less acceptable when applied to larger countries who take up to 1,000 whales a year. There are several arguments against whaling. It is easier to discover and flesh out these arguments because the majority of the world seems to agree with them. First and foremost is the argument against whaling based on animal cruelty. In one method, whales are separated from their pod, surrounded by a semi-circle of boats, and then driven to the beach. Once beached, the whale is cut down the spinal cord with a sharp knife, severing.